THE ERGONOMIC NATURE OF THE MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION AS A SUBJECT OF ASSESSMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2023-038-1-003Keywords:
basic ergonomic pattern, evaluation model, ergonomic level, criterion, evaluation criterion scaleAbstract
Formulation of the problem. According to our observations, student multimedia presentations often lack ergonomic elaboration. Intending to teach students self-assessment of the ergonomic nature of these multimedia objects, we wondered: what characteristics of a multimedia presentation are the basis for judging its ergonomic level as acceptable?
Materials and methods. The guiding ideas of the study were the principles of ergonomic design of multimedia user interfaces, set out in the National Standard of Ukraine SSTU EN ISO 14915 1:2009. The problem of evaluating the ergonomic level of the multimedia presentation is considered from the standpoint of Decision Theory. To solve it, a model approach has been applied.
Results. Two interrelated theoretical constructs have been developed: (1) a description of an ergonomic basic pattern for non-interactive multimedia presentations with a minimum set of static media; (2) a criterion model for assessing the ergonomic level of such presentations. The pattern has three characteristics that summarize the peculiaritys of the cognitive processing of information by a person. They are embodied by nine observable signs that can be directly evaluated. The criterion model is developed in the logic of constructing a multi-criteria model of the decision-making problem. Its key elements are a set of criteria and a set of criteria scales. The observed signs of the pattern are used as criteria. They are provided with binary scales. All wording and descriptions have a clear and unambiguous meaning.
Conclusions. Two proposals are substantiated: (1) to consider a non-interactive multimedia presentation ergonomic if it has the following characteristics: suitability for the communication goal; suitability for understanding and memorization; suitability for perception; (2) To assess the ergonomic level of a multimedia presentation as acceptable if all nine criteria have been fulfilled. The developed theoretical constructs form the basis of informative feedback between teachers and students.
Downloads
References
REFERENCES (TRANSLATED AND TRANSLITERATED)
Andrade, H. (2005) Teaching with Rubrics: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly. College Teaching, 1(53), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.
Andrade, H. (2008). Self-Assessment Through Rubrics. Educational Leadership. 4 (65), 60-63. https://pdo.ascd.org/lmscourses/PD11OC101/media/FA_M06_Reading_03_Self_Assessment.pdf.
Andrade, H. (2019). A Critical Review of Research on Student Self-Assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4. DOI:10.3389/feduc.2019.00087.
Crowell, T. (2015). Student Self Grading: Perception vs. Reality. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 450-55. DOI: 10.12691/education-3-4-10.
Dieorditsa, T., Bilevych, S., & Voronina, M. (2019). Kryterialne samootsiniuvannia akademichnoi prezentatsii. Metodychni rekomendatsii dlia studentiv usikh pedahohichnykh spetsialnostei (Criterion self-assessment of academic presentation. Methodological recommendations for students of all pedagogical specialties). (Svidotstvo pro reiestratsiiu avtorskoho prava na tvir № 91115 (Certificate of copyright registration for the work No. 91115)). Avtorske pravo i sumizhni prava. Biuleten № 54. (In Ukrainian).
Dieorditsa, T., Voronina, M., Yepifanova, O., & Tolmachov, V. (2022). Myslennieva taktyka zasvoiuvannia terminiv fakhovoi movy [Thinking tactic of professional language terminology acquisition]. Fizyko-matematychna osvita – Physical and Mathematical Education, 34(2), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.31110/2413-1571-2022-034-2-004. (in Ukrainian).
Fomin, A. (2011). Razvitie navykov elepolanija sredstvami treninga konkretizacii celej (Development of goal-setting skills by means of goal specification training). Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological Science and Education), 3 (3). psyjournals.ru/psyedu_ru/2011/n3/47080_full.shtml. (In Russian).
Gaft, M. (1979). Prinjatie reshenij pri mnogih kriterijah (Decision-making under many criteria)). Znanie. (In Russian)
Herrity, J. (2022, May 31). How to Write a Conclusion (With Tips and Examples). Indeed. https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/how-to-write-a-conclusion.
International Organization for Standardization. (2002). Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces — Part 1: Design principles and framework (DSTU EN ISO 14915-1:2009). UkrNDNTs. (In Ukrainian).
International Organization for Stadardization. (2018). Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part. 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (ISO Standard No 9241 11:2018).
Kosslyn, S., Kievit, R., Russell, A., & Shephard, J. (2012). PowerPoint© Presentation Flaws and Failures: A Psychological Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00230.
Krathwohl, D. (2002). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy: An Overview, 4(41), 2012-2018. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
McDaniel, E. (1993). Understanding Educational Measurement. Brown & Benchmark Pub.
Munipov, V., & Zinchenko, V. (2001). Jergonomika: chelovekoorientirovannoe proektirovanie tehniki, programmnyh sredstv sredy (Ergonomics: human-centred design of technology, software and environment). Logos. (In Russian).
Obzhorin, A. (2016, 12.07). 15 luchshih prezentacij v mire: kriterii masterstva (Top 15 Presentations in the World: Criteria for Excellence). Blog o vizual'noj gramotnosti (Visual literacy blog). https://vizual.club/2017/05/27/15-presentacy/. (In Russian).
Parondzhanov, V. (2017). Kak napisat’ horoshij uchebnik dlja horoshih ljudej. Uchebniki, o kotoryh mechtajut student I shkol’niki (How to write a good tutorial for good people. Textbooks that students dream of). DMK Press. (In Russian).
Reynolds, G. (2009). Presentation Zen Design: Simple Design Principles and Techniques to Enhance Your Presentations. New Riders.
SUM-11: Slovnyk ukrainskoi movy (Dictionary of Ukrainian language). (1970-1980). Naukova dumka. (In Ukrainian).
Ukrainskyi naukovo-doslidnyi instytut dyzainu ta erhonomiky NAU (Ukrainia Research Institute of Design and Ergonomics). (2014). Dyzain i erhonomika. Terminy ta vyznachennia osnovnykh poniat (Design and Ergonomics. Terms and definitions of basic concepts). (DSTU 3899:2013). Minekonomrozvytku Ukrainy. (In Ukrainian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Таяна Дєордіца, Світлана Білевич, Марина Вороніна, Раїса Гладушина
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors grant the journal a right of the first publication of the work under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)that allows others freely to use (read, copy and print) submissions, search content and link to published articles, disseminate their full text and use them for any legitimate non-commercial purposes (i.e. educational or scientific) with the mandatory reference to the article’s authors and initial publication in this journal.
- Original published articles cannot be used by users (exept authors) for commercial purposes or distributed by third-party intermediary organizations for a fee.
